A letter arrives from a lawyer. It names your company, describes a dispute, and tells you to preserve all documents and electronically stored information that might relate to it. If you have in-house counsel, they take it from there. If you do not, the letter usually lands with whoever runs operations, and the question becomes very practical very quickly: what, exactly, are we supposed to stop doing?
This is the IT side of that answer, written for a business that has received a preservation demand or a litigation hold instruction from its own attorney, not for a law firm. The aim is simple: nothing relevant disappears between now and the day counsel says you can stop.
It is practical guidance, not legal advice. Your attorney decides the scope. IT carries it out, and documents that it did.
What the Notice Is Actually Asking For
A litigation hold suspends your normal deletion for a defined set of information. Three things define it, and IT should not start until it has all three from counsel in writing:
Who. The custodians: the people whose email, files, chats and devices may hold relevant material. Usually named individuals, sometimes whole departments.
When. The date range. Often it runs back months or years before the dispute surfaced, and it always runs forward until the hold is released.
What. The kinds of information: email, shared files, chat, accounting records, a particular application, phone records, sometimes paper.
The duty to preserve does not wait for a lawsuit. It starts when litigation is reasonably anticipated, which is why a demand letter, a regulator’s inquiry or a threatening resignation email can be enough. The practical consequence for IT is speed: the gap between the letter arriving and the deletion stopping is where most of the risk sits.
Stop the Things That Delete Automatically
Most data in a modern business is not deleted by people. It is deleted by schedules nobody remembers setting. Those are what a hold has to interrupt first.
| What normally removes data | What to do while the hold is in force |
|---|---|
| Retention policies that empty Deleted Items, expire chats or purge old files | Exclude the custodians, or apply a hold that overrides the policy |
| Account cleanup when someone leaves, including deleting the mailbox to free a licence | Keep the account and mailbox intact for anyone in scope |
| Device recycling: reimaging laptops and phones for the next user | Set covered devices aside, labelled, unwiped |
| Backup rotation that overwrites or expires older copies | Ask counsel whether existing backups are in scope before they age out |
| Log rollover in firewalls, sign-in records and applications | Export the relevant window if counsel says logs matter |
Backups deserve a specific conversation with your attorney rather than a reflex. Keeping every backup indefinitely is expensive and often unnecessary when the live data is properly held; letting the only copy of something relevant expire is the opposite problem. It is a scoping decision, and it belongs to counsel.
Where the Relevant Data Really Lives
The mailbox is the obvious place and rarely the only one. When you list systems for counsel, include:
Files and chat
OneDrive and SharePoint, Google Drive, Teams chats and channels, Slack. Business conversations moved out of email years ago, and a hold on email alone leaves most of them exposed.
The systems that run the work
Accounting, CRM, project management, HR and payroll platforms. These often have their own deletion rules, and some vendors need to be asked directly to hold data.
Laptops and phones
Local files, downloads and text messages, on company devices and sometimes personal ones. Counsel decides scope; IT should say plainly which channels people really use.
Vendors and shared accounts
The portal a client shares with you, the file transfer service, the shared login to a supplier system. Not yours to switch off, which is exactly why it needs to be on the list.
Holds in Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace
Both platforms can preserve data in place, so nothing has to be copied out to a drive on day one. The details matter, and licensing is where businesses get caught.
Microsoft 365. A mailbox litigation hold keeps everything in that mailbox, including items the user deletes or purges, until the hold is removed. It needs an Exchange Online Plan 2 licence, or Plan 1 with the Exchange Online Archiving add-on, so many small-business subscriptions cannot apply one without a licence change. Microsoft notes it can take up to 240 minutes to take effect. The mailbox hold covers the mailbox; files in OneDrive and SharePoint and conversations in Teams channels need their own hold, set through Microsoft Purview.
Google Workspace. Holds are set in Google Vault, which is included in Business Plus and the Enterprise editions but not in Business Starter or Business Standard. Organisations on those plans need to upgrade or add Vault licences before they can place a hold.
Check the licence before you report the hold as done. The most common failure we see is a hold that someone believes was applied, on a mailbox whose licence never supported it.
When Someone on the Hold List Leaves
Normal offboarding and a litigation hold pull in opposite directions. Offboarding wants accounts closed, licences recovered and laptops back in circulation. A hold wants everything left exactly as it is.
For anyone in scope, the hold wins. Disable sign-in so the person cannot reach the data, but do not delete the account, the mailbox or the files, and do not reimage the laptop. Remove or change licences only after confirming the hold survives the change, because on some configurations removing the licence disables the mailbox the hold depends on. Our offboarding guide covers the normal sequence; under a hold, the deletion steps simply do not happen.
Preserve in Place, Collect Later
The well-meaning mistake is to start gathering: forwarding emails to a folder, copying files to a USB drive, asking people to send what they think is relevant. All of it changes metadata, mixes originals with copies, and creates questions about completeness that are hard to answer later.
Preservation and collection are separate steps. Preservation, which is IT’s job now, means freezing data where it lives. Collection, when it comes, is usually directed by counsel and sometimes performed by an e-discovery vendor using tools that record how and when each item was gathered. Do the first well and the second becomes routine.
What a Court Can Do When Data Goes Missing
In federal court, Rule 37(e) governs lost electronically stored information. If data that should have been preserved is lost because a party did not take reasonable steps, and it cannot be restored or replaced, the court can order measures to cure the harm to the other side. If it finds the party acted with intent to deprive the other side of the information, it can presume the information was unfavourable, instruct the jury accordingly, or dismiss the case or enter a default judgment.
California state courts have their own tools under the Civil Discovery Act, and juries can be instructed that they may infer evidence a party suppressed would have been unfavourable to it. California also protects information lost through the routine, good-faith operation of a system, but that protection does not relieve anyone of the duty to preserve once it applies.
The standard throughout is reasonable steps, which is why the record of what IT did, and when, matters almost as much as the doing.
The Order to Work In
- Get the scope in writing. Custodians, date range and categories of data, from counsel. Ask questions now rather than guess.
- Stop automatic deletion. Retention policies, account cleanup and device recycling, for everyone in scope.
- Apply platform holds. Mailboxes, OneDrive and SharePoint, Teams or Vault, after confirming each licence supports it.
- Set devices aside. Label them, store them, and keep them out of the reimaging pile.
- Contact the vendors. Ask line-of-business and SaaS providers in scope how they preserve data, and keep their replies.
- Write it down. A dated log of every action, who took it and what it covered. If the steps are ever questioned, this is the answer.
Litigation Hold Questions, Answered
Related reading: Employee Offboarding: What IT Must Do · What Belongs in an AI Acceptable Use Policy · Does the CCPA Apply to You?
Facing a Hold Without an IT Department?
We work alongside your attorney to scope the systems, apply and verify the holds, and keep a dated record of every step. If a preservation letter has just arrived, our compliance team can usually start the same day.